10 Comments

Hi Lionel - do you have any thoughts on DoT requirement? their approval could be a wild card - that's a big overhang / risk that a lot of arbs haven't been able to handicap

Expand full comment

Hi Lionel, thanks-appreciate the thoughtful writeup! Regarding your statement "He’s earned a reputation as an even-handed arbiter over his nearly 4 decades on the bench", do you have any experience with Judge Young or have you read/skimmed his cases involving corporations?...Judge Young seems to always rule in favor of corporations.

Expand full comment
author

I think to say he “always rules in favor of corporations” is a bit misleading. A large percentage of federal cases are “corporation v. corporation,” and let’s be honest—corporations tend to have the funds to put on a better case. Simply tallying wins is not a reliable indicator. As to the precedent he has set, I don’t find the notable cases to be overly-corporation friendly. He is a fierce advocate of the jury system as the most reliable fact finder (though this case will not be a jury trial, as that is not up to him). He can famously name those he has sentenced in criminal cases who have died in prison—hardly something I’d call characteristic of a conservative judge.

All that being said, my statement was largely based on statements from others who have litigated in front of him. I have never personally litigated a case in front of him.

Hope that helps!

Expand full comment

Thanks-that helps! Regarding your statement: "He can famously name those he has sentenced in criminal cases who have died in prison", what is the underlying meaning...that he cares about each individual?

A completely separate question: Is there a free way to read the judge’s questioning/daily happenings transcript on the trial days in Oct2023 (or someone's daily writings on it)? The reason I ask is the judge's questions can hint at how he may rule...as was the situation with with the Twitter judge (I realize that was Delaware Chancery as opposed to this being District Court).

Expand full comment

Thanks for the great write-up.

I think the market is concerned about the "survival" of either companies at this point. If the deal doesn't go through, Spirit is currently in bad shape and from an investing standpoint, I feel like the downside is greater than anticipated before the latest quarter. JetBlue has also deteriorated since the deal was made and I think the market is seeing considerable risks in JBLU not being able to "afford" the deal (which is very rich compared to what Spirit actually is today). This also challenges the potential upside thinking : could we see an attempt from JBLU to pull a (AMZN-IRBT) where the acquisition price gets redone? Is there a "legal" chance of this happening? Could JBLU legally forfeit the deal based on its current "health", arguing that the deal would kill JBLU as a company if things continue to deteriorate? I don't have any opinion on any of these but I feel like this is what the market is pricing in.

Expand full comment

Is a potential update something you are considering for the future

Expand full comment

How many overlaps are left now with JBLU divesting the holdings? Are there any significant increase of market share left?

Expand full comment

Looking ugly now

Expand full comment

Hi Lionel, any thoughts here on the eve of the trial? I’m wondering if the poor results and projected results for SAVE have changed your thought on the arb in either direction?

Expand full comment

Thank you for a great read!

Expand full comment